<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Buddhi Free - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-e816b398" type="application/json"/><link>http://buddhifree.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://buddhifree.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:59:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Marketing 101: Product Hierarchy, Product Mix &amp;#038; Concept of Core/Augmented Product</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/08/marketing-101-product-hierarchy-product-mix-concept-of-coreaugmented-product/#comment-417199523</link><description>Very Nice.... Can you take an example of any Product (Goods)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Naresh Chk</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:59:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Birth</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/08/birth/#comment-325112321</link><description>birth goo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Loved it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bhavika Aggarwal</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:24:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 64, and onwards ho!</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/08/64-onwards-ho/#comment-325111309</link><description>Have you seen Hans Rosling's TED talks? They're awesomeness.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ted.com/talks/hans_rosling_shows_the_best_stats_you_ve_ever_seen.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.ted.com/talks/hans_...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ted.com/talks/hans_rosling_asia_s_rise_how_and_when.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.ted.com/talks/hans_...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bhavika Aggarwal</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:22:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: That food grain issue</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/07/that-food-grain-issue/#comment-325109144</link><description>Are you serious? Why can't they, like, oh my god, feed the hungry?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On a aside, don't you need to cite sources for your figures?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bhavika Aggarwal</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:16:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Birth</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/08/birth/#comment-280458734</link><description>thanks :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rachit Agarwal</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 11:17:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Birth</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/08/birth/#comment-279687478</link><description>Brilliantly written.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amit Raichandani</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 08:07:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: That food grain issue</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/07/that-food-grain-issue/#comment-261675518</link><description>Aw, look at you...all grown up and writing about politics. :')</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ankur Banerjee</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 05:56:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amadeus</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/07/amadeus/#comment-252682232</link><description>Might just add this to my list of things to watch when I am out of things to do, because am a bit of a Mozart fan myself, though not knowledgeable at all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vivek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 07:45:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mumbai: Failure of Collective Intelligence?</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/07/mumbai-failure-of-collective-intelligence/#comment-252680948</link><description>I agree with most of what you're trying to put across in this post. Coordination between intelligence agencies can be much better. Sure, they're sending reports to one another, but they're a) not always taken 100% seriously, b) mainly used to disclaim any blame that might come their way after a security breach has taken place.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Besides, it's not just intelligence, but vigilance too. The police force aren't paid well (on par with, say, private security guards), often get to work long hours (I assume) and thus may not always be 100% on the job, physically or mentally. Sure, you'll probably raise hell about corruption if I try to side with them, but I'd like to point out that they too are doing a job, and to maximize productivity, they better have some incentives to perform: to check each car entering the border properly, to check every passenger entering a railway station, to make road barricades worthwhile. &lt;br&gt;The trigger shouldn't be an intelligence report in the first case.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vivek</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 07:41:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amadeus</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/07/amadeus/#comment-252266685</link><description>there's a difference between over-the-top acting for film, and for theatre. sadly, the acting on display was of the theatrical variety. that's what i have a problem with.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rachit Agarwal</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:50:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amadeus</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/07/amadeus/#comment-252264632</link><description>The "over the top" acting was the need of the hour. As his acting in the first scene itself gave a gist of the infantile and nasty character i.e "MOZART".</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arjun</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:47:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amadeus</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/07/amadeus/#comment-250821317</link><description>it's not a bad movie per se. just that the opening two thirds of it dont really gel all that well with the last third. the last third is really good, though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rachit Agarwal</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:00:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amadeus</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/07/amadeus/#comment-249992823</link><description>If the high point of a movie on Mozart is the music (as you seem to imply), it isn't a good movie at all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ankur Banerjee</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:00:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Tihar Tea Party</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/07/tihar-tea-party/#comment-247032281</link><description>err...is that a good thing or a bad thing?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rachit Agarwal</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 03:15:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Tihar Tea Party</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/07/tihar-tea-party/#comment-247004888</link><description>This reminds me of a music video by APC, for some reason. &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KO3l733WRN0" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...&lt;/a&gt; Also, SRK. &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdBwiFiosYE" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ankur Banerjee</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:50:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are posthumous Oscars fair?</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2008/07/are-posthumous-oscars-fair/#comment-204515724</link><description>I don't know how but i stumbled upon this post, and i totally agree.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SidharthRaja</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 11:34:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Life, the Universe and Everything/ Metro HoHo/ Routine</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/01/metro-hoh/#comment-128099098</link><description>why, thank you :)though the score now is 4-1.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rachit Agarwal</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 03:33:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Life, the Universe and Everything/ Metro HoHo/ Routine</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/01/metro-hoh/#comment-127680355</link><description>NOW the score is 1-1. And in such style!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ankur Banerjee</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:00:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Life, the Universe and Everything/ Metro HoHo/ Routine</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/01/metro-hoh/#comment-127533075</link><description>thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rachit Agarwal</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 05:35:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kwo-oh-fee! (Screenplay)</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/01/kwo-oh-fee-screenplay/#comment-127532925</link><description>already made this. didnt turn out as funny as imagined.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rachit Agarwal</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 05:34:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Headless Chicken (Screenplay)</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/01/headless-chicken/#comment-127532824</link><description>ha thanks man. this is almost completely shot. need to take a couple more shots and edit it...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rachit Agarwal</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 05:33:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kwo-oh-fee! (Screenplay)</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/01/kwo-oh-fee-screenplay/#comment-127532745</link><description>I think that's besides the point. This screenplay is somewhat harder to imagine in my head. You just go ahead and make it into a short film and tell me when you're ready. Unless of course, you're just a screenplaywright (I don't think this is a word, but it conveys the meaning).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vivek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 05:33:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Headless Chicken (Screenplay)</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/01/headless-chicken/#comment-127531676</link><description>Hmm. The very last scene will be a bit tricky... Otherwise I like the general flow of it. You've managed to convey your message pretty well. ;) Hope this moves beyond screenplay.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vivek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 05:24:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Life, the Universe and Everything/ Metro HoHo/ Routine</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/01/metro-hoh/#comment-127530792</link><description>I love this piece of writing. There is no other way to put it. It's just so true for a majority of people. Great introspection there my friend. See you later today.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vivek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 05:15:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kwo-oh-fee! (Screenplay)</title><link>http://buddhifree.com/2011/01/kwo-oh-fee-screenplay/#comment-125646762</link><description>i swear you said the British mafia. i even remember pointing out a few guy ritchie movies as examples. this was around the time you were sleep drunk, so you might have forgotten about it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rachit Agarwal</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 09:34:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
